标题:[原创]官员升迁去留 民意高低评议
1楼：击水遏飞舟zfl发布时间:2010-9-18 16:52:07
[align=center][size=14pt]官员升迁去留[/size][size=14pt] 民意高低评议[/size][size=14pt][/size][/align]
[size=14pt] 领导干部公开选拔又有新的样本。重庆市九龙坡区拿出区委研究室主任等13个处级领导职位进行全程差额公开选拔，目前竞岗演讲和差额推荐环节已经结束，即将进入差额考察环节。（9月14日《人民日报》）[/size][size=14pt][/size]
[size=14pt] 九龙坡区[/size][size=14pt]这次[/size][size=14pt]公选[/size][size=14pt]的[/size][size=14pt]一个创新之举，是邀请了由党代表、人大代表、政协委员和机关一般干部组成的20名群众评委，群众评委打分的权重占20%。这[/size][size=14pt]是[/size][size=14pt]作官员选拔任用体现民意的一次有益尝试，尽管民意的权重只有20%，[/size][size=14pt]并不算高[/size][size=14pt]。[/size][size=14pt][/size]
[size=14pt]从根本上说，官员的权力来源于人民的授权[/size][size=14pt]，应由[/size][size=14pt]公众通过法律程序，把公共权力“委托”给他们信得过的人[/size][size=14pt]，而实际上，这样的做法[/size][size=14pt]在社会现实中往往沦为纸上谈兵[/size][size=14pt]，甚为空洞[/size][size=14pt]。[/size][size=14pt]虽然[/size][size=14pt]伴随着干部人事制度改革的推进，选人用人制度的不断创新与发展[/size][size=14pt]，出现了[/size][size=14pt]公务员“逢进必考”、领导干部任前公示的落实，公开选拔领导干部范围和对象不断扩大，官员政绩考核中设计民意测评环节等等[/size][size=14pt]，但[/size][size=14pt]官员选拔任用还是没能突出民意的应有地位，没有走出“少数人选人”的迷途。[/size][size=14pt][/size]
[size=14pt]九龙坡区公选的创新之举是一个不小的进步，虽然[/size][size=14pt]20%相对来说太少，但至少体现了民意，相信在选人用人制度不断改革和创新的大环境下，[/size][size=14pt]最终[/size][size=14pt]是能够[/size][size=14pt]实现让民意决定官员升迁去留的目标[/size][size=14pt]，因为[/size][size=14pt]只有这样，官员的决策与施政，乃至言行举止，才不会罔顾民意。[/size][size=14pt][/size]
[size=14pt][/size]
[size=14pt][/size]
2楼：jjyu8181发布时间:2010-9-18 17:56:05
[emm1][emm1][emm1]
太好了！太好了！！全国各级都能这样就是真正的进步了！胡温应该推广哦！！
3楼：游客发布时间:2010-9-18 17:57:34
4楼：tuyuyan123456发布时间:2010-9-18 19:21:50
称得称赞的要称赞！[em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2][em2]